Add a step where you want it
Put a step exactly where it belongs in the flow rather than at the end of a list you then have to reorder.
Every step shows you what it is set to do, right there next to the steps either side of it. Working out what a workflow does is reading it, not opening seven things in turn and holding them in your head. Nothing you change here touches what is running.
On the step itself. A prompt, a URL or a schedule is typed where the step sits, so you are reading it in context with whatever feeds it and whatever it feeds. Renaming a step is done in place too, which is worth doing: a workflow whose steps are named after what they do can be understood by someone who did not build it.
Two kinds of connection exist and you cannot accidentally make the wrong one. Most connections carry a value from one step to the next. The other kind attaches a template to an AI step, which is how you get back named fields you can use downstream instead of a paragraph you have to pick apart.
Every step you can add is grouped by what it is for, so finding the right one is a matter of knowing what you want to happen rather than remembering what it is called. Get it out of the way when you want the room to think, and it comes back the way you left it.
There is no save button, because there is nothing to remember to press. Close the tab mid sentence, run out of battery, walk away for a week: the workflow is how you left it when you come back, and you can always tell whether it has caught up with you.

Move something, then switch to Live. What you moved is still where it was, because Live is a different workflow: the one running right now. You can look at it as much as you like and you cannot break it. Publishing is the moment your changes take over.
Draft. Autosaved. Nothing here affects a running workflow.
You can tell which one you are looking at without checking, which matters when you are in a hurry.
Put a step exactly where it belongs in the flow rather than at the end of a list you then have to reorder.
A step called "Draft the reply" tells the next person what the workflow does. A step called "AI 3" tells them nothing.
You cannot wire two steps together in a way that would not work. The mistake is prevented rather than reported back to you at runtime.
Runs starting and finishing appear as you build, so you find out something broke while you are still in the workflow that broke it.
Begin with a workflow that already does the job and change the parts that differ, instead of from an empty page.
Give a workflow to specific teams, or leave it open to everyone in the organisation.
You can run a workflow from inside the builder, with the inputs you want to try, and see what it does. There is no test mode and no sandbox, which sounds like a gap and is the point: what you just watched happen is what will happen at three in the morning when nobody is looking.
You will see it finish without leaving the workflow, and if you want to know precisely what each step received and returned, that is in the run history.
You can both work on the same workflow and you will see each other's changes arrive. What you will not see is where their cursor is, so this is better suited to two people working on different parts than to two people hovering over the same step. If you do both change the same thing at once, one of you is told about it rather than quietly losing the work.
Start from a template or from nothing. Either way the first publish is the moment anything becomes real.
Free plan, no card.